Hello,
I'm sorry to hear that.
Anyway, I hope it's clear for everybody that I totally don't care what review people leave in the asset store, so there's no point mentioning that in the hope that you'll be treated better than if you don't. I do my best to help everybody provided they help themselves enough.
In your situation, your problems were successively:
- You encountered a crash in the Swift compiler while trying to build Pods (https://www.pmbaty.com/iosbuildenv/help/thread.php?path=Problem%20solving/&file=build-crash). Since I now provide the official Win32 builds from Swift.org, there's nothing I could do about it unfortunately. I then advised you to use precompiled binaries.
- You didn't and tried to just skip the pods instead : that couldn't work.
- Then you went back to trying to use CocoaPods again. After what you hit a mixed sources problem, which is a no-go.
Well. Is there a reason why you didn't follow the recommendation I gave, which was to *not* use CocoaPods but instead gather all your project's 3rd-party dependencies in form of precompiled binaries and frameworks, and inject them into the build, as explained in the documentation ? I would have assisted you with that.
Did you try it ? In case you did and you encountered difficulties, what were them and did you ask for help about those ? I checked the forum and I couldn't find where, but maybe I missed it.
Anyway, I'm okay to refund people when things don't work, provided enough effort must have been done in following the workarounds I suggest when something doesn't work out of the box before we arrive to this outcome. It's not just "I spent xxx time on the problem and it didn't work": you understand that if that time was spent in other directions than the one I advised, I can't guarantee it was time spent productively. No offense intended of course.
So let me please know first if you did follow that recommendation, and where it led you to. I might have missed it on the forum ; or if we exchanged by e-mail on this subject, be kind enough to remind me the date it was please.
(P.S. my first reply was essentially the same but lacked some rounding around the edges. I rewrote it, I hope it's more palatable now.)